New Life Project (AMATYC, et al)

A plan for … fewer developmental courses, fewer enrollments in developmental courses, and higher success rates in developmental courses (all without losing mathematical rigor or preparation).  The goals … students get better preparation for all of their courses, experience appropriate mathematics, and spend less time in non-credit courses.

Since 2009, AMATYC’s Developmental Mathematics Committee has been working (along with other professionals) on a complete reformation of the developmental mathematics curriculum.  This work was not done in isolation; the group based its work on the professional expertise of dozens of faculty.  One notable source of information was the MAA “CRAFTY” reports; other sources included the AMS report on client disciplines, the Numeracy Network, and (centrally) “Beyond Crossroads” (the professional standards for mathematics in the first two years of college).

See the Beyond Crossroads professional standards at http://beyondcrossroads.amatyc.org/

The New Life community is online at http://dm-live.wikispaces.com/

KEY FEATURES:

A “Mathematical Literacy for College Students” (MLCS) course provides the powerful tools that students need in their preparation for basic science, technology, and even college mathematics classes.    The MLCS course is visualized as being at the same level as ‘beginning algebra’, though this is an incomplete visualization.  Some students could take MLCS who are ‘not ready’ for beginning algebra, as the procedural load is lighter in MLCS … the work in MLCS is more conceptual (still some procedures).

Many students would only need that one course … MLCS, which saves one or even two courses for a large portion of our population.  Primarily, it is those students who need a traditional college-level math course (college algebra, pre-calculus, etc) who would need more developmental work than that found in MLCS.

For those who need a second developmental course, the model describes an “Algebraic Literacy” course.  This represents a modern view of a course at the level of intermediate algebra.  By building on the powerful ideas in MLCS, the Algebraic Literacy course adds other ideas and also develops the sets of skills identified as being critical for the college-math courses.

Within this framework, the model also calls for us to modernize our instruction and assessment by integrated a variety of teaching methods, using diverse technology, and assessing student learning in deeper ways.  Changing the content is not enough, just like changing the methodology is not enough.

 

The Instant Presentations page has a number of presentations dealing with the New Life model; take a look!!

New Math Pathways General Vision 2 5 16

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

You can learn more about the New Life model by exploring this blog and the New Life wiki (http://dm-live.wikispaces.com/).  We make presentations at each AMATYC conference, and at many affiliate conferences.  Our team includes a group of people who might be able to travel for an on-site workshop; contact Jack at rotmanj@lcc.edu to explore those possibilities.

 

The original work of the New Life project contributed to the Carnegie Foundation Pathways (Quantway and Statway), and the Dana Center Mathways; for more information see those pages.

3 Comments

  • By Louise Huriwtz, June 8, 2011 @ 7:23 pm

    Hello,

    I just found your blog yesterday, as I was searching for good blogs to add as a feed to my blog. I have added your blog as a feed to mine and hope that my subscribers look at it. I think it would be great if they looked at the model you describe in this post.

    If you have a chance, please take a look at my blog and please consider adding it as a feed to yours.

    Thanks for providing me with such useful content about dev. math

  • By Jack Rotman, June 9, 2011 @ 1:00 pm

    I did take a look at your blog … you are doing some good work!! And, I appreciate you linking my blog into yours.
    At this point, however, I am not ‘feeding’ anything in to my blog. It’s not that the material is not worthy; the problem is that there are many sites that are pretty good — too many. I may eventually link some into my blog, but I am currently thinking it’s best for this blog to not have this.
    Thanks!

  • By Jack Rotman, December 3, 2011 @ 3:43 pm

    Louise:
    Thanks for your support of my blog, and I think it is a great service that you are ‘feeding’ my blog into yours.
    I’ve had several requests like this … and I am generally taking a ‘no’ approach; it’s not that the other blogs are not good enough — yours is very nice. My blog’s goal is more specific than most; I am not just sharing ideas to improve everybody’s developmental math classes as they are … I am trying to get more people to look at a basic redesign to create courses that would replace the traditional ‘algebra’ oriented courses. Because of this, I am thinking that it would work better to just include feeds for blogs that have a similar goal.
    Again, thanks for the note … and keep up the good work on your blog!
    Jack

Other Links to this Post

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

WordPress Themes